Prijava

ajatola najavio da će konfiskuje bahrein emirate i tako te proksi državice ako ješo ameri budu nastavili da prave sranja

jedan je brat ajatola

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/SassanidEmpireTrueExtent.png

Gledaju cionisti kako da grunu Al Aksu i okrive Iran.

Pa izguglaj.

Short answer: not as a sovereign, independent state in the modern sense—especially before 1947. But that doesn’t mean the name or identity didn’t exist. It did, just in a different form.

Here’s the clear breakdown:

1. Ancient and classical periods

The term “Palestine” goes way back, but not as an independent nation-state.
• The Romans renamed the region Syria Palaestina after crushing the Bar Kokhba revolt.
• It was an administrative region, not a self-governing country.

2. Islamic empires (7th century → early 1500s)

Under various caliphates (Umayyad, Abbasid, etc.):
• The area was known as Jund Filastin
• Again: a province within larger empires, not an independent state.

3. Ottoman Empire (1517–1917)

For 400 years under the Ottoman Empire:
• There was no political unit officially called “Palestine”
• The land was divided into districts like Vilayet of Beirut and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem

That said, the term “Palestine” was still used informally and geographically by locals and foreigners.

4. British Mandate (1917–1948)

This is the first time “Palestine” becomes an official political entity in modern terms:
• The League of Nations created the Mandatory Palestine
• It was governed by Britain—not independent

This is also when modern Palestinian Arab identity really consolidates politically, especially in response to Zionism and British rule.

5. 1947 turning point
• The United Nations proposed partition into Jewish and Arab states
• War followed → 1948 Arab–Israeli War
• Israel declared independence; no Arab Palestinian state emerged at that time

So what’s the honest conclusion?
• No, there was never a fully sovereign Palestinian state before 1947
• Yes, “Palestine” absolutely existed as:
• a geographic region
• an administrative term
• and eventually a developing national identity

Why this question gets heated

People often mix up two different things:
• “Was there a state?” → No
• “Did a people/identity tied to that land exist?” → Yes, especially by the 20th century

Both sides in the debate tend to cherry-pick one of those and ignore the other.